From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

D.J.M., E.K.M. v. Dept of H R Serv

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 30, 1994
634 So. 2d 260 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

Nos. 93-3944, 93-3945.

March 30, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Nassau County, Robert Williams, J.

Daniel S. Brim, Fernandina Beach, for appellant.

No response by appellee.


The appellant challenges adjudicatory and disposition orders entered in juvenile dependency proceedings, asserting that the court did not comply with its obligations under Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.320, in connection with the right to counsel. Although the appellant was initially accompanied by an attorney who was representing him in a separate matter, the court recognized that this attorney was not serving as counsel in these dependency proceedings. The appellant remained unrepresented through the further course of these proceedings, and the court failed to adequately advise the appellant as to the right to counsel or to ascertain whether the appellant fully understood this right. Such noncompliance with the mandate in the rule requires reversal.

The appealed orders are reversed and the cause is remanded.

BOOTH, ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

D.J.M., E.K.M. v. Dept of H R Serv

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 30, 1994
634 So. 2d 260 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

D.J.M., E.K.M. v. Dept of H R Serv

Case Details

Full title:D.J.M., THE NATURAL FATHER OF E.K.M., A CHILD, APPELLANT, v. DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 30, 1994

Citations

634 So. 2d 260 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Henry v. SBA Shipyard, Inc.

The current State of Louisiana jurisprudence answers that question with an unequivocal "no." Estate of…