From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 2, 1992
610 So. 2d 35 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-02295.

December 2, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Harry Lee Coe, III, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Ann P. Corcoran, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We find merit in only one of the three issues Dixon has raised on appeal. The trial court sentenced Dixon to two consecutive three-year minimum mandatory sentences for offenses arising out of the same transaction. This was error. See Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla. 1992); Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1983). Thus, we correct the sentences in counts eight and ten to reflect concurrent minimum mandatory sentences. Otherwise, we affirm Dixon's judgment and sentences.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and HALL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dixon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 2, 1992
610 So. 2d 35 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Dixon v. State

Case Details

Full title:KEM ALEX DIXON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 2, 1992

Citations

610 So. 2d 35 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)