Dixon v. Moore

Full title: CHRISTOPHER DIXON, Plaintiff, v. ERNIE MOORE, WARDEN Defendant

Court: United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Mar 2, 2006

Case No. 3-:04-CV-308 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 2, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 3-:04-CV-308.

March 2, 2006

ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING CHRISTOPHER DIXON'S OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING DIXON'S PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS; ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN ITS ENTIRETY AND TERMINATING THIS CASE

THOMAS ROSE, District Judge

This matter is now before the Court pursuant to Objections (doc. #10) filed by Christopher Dixon, pro se, to the Report and Recommendations issued on November 15, 2005, by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (doc. #9). The District Judge has reviewed the findings of Magistrate Judge Ovington. The District Judge has also made a de novo review of the record in this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court finds that the Objections are not well-taken and they are hereby OVERRULED.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations is ADOPTED in its entirety. Christopher Dixon's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED. A certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) will not issue and the captioned cause is hereby ordered terminated upon the docket records of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton.

DONE and ORDERED.