From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. Harrington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 21, 2013
1:13-cv-00165 (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)

Opinion

1:13-cv-00165 (PC)

02-21-2013

TRADELL M. DIXON, Plaintiff, v. KELL HARRINGTON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

(DOCUMENT #2)

Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 28, 2013, plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Examination of these documents reveals that plaintiff is unable to afford the costs of this action. Accordingly, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Gary S. Austin

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Dixon v. Harrington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 21, 2013
1:13-cv-00165 (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Dixon v. Harrington

Case Details

Full title:TRADELL M. DIXON, Plaintiff, v. KELL HARRINGTON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 21, 2013

Citations

1:13-cv-00165 (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)