From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. Conway

Supreme Court of Georgia
Feb 5, 1993
262 Ga. 709 (Ga. 1993)

Opinion

S92A1443.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 5, 1993.

Equity. Chatham Superior Court. Before Judge Cheatham.

Clarence L. Martin, for appellants.

Wiseman, Blackburn Futrell, James B. Blackburn, Jr., Douglas M. Robinson, for appellee.


The Dixons sought to redeem real property sold at a tax sale and filed suit for legal and equitable relief to compel Conway to convey by quitclaim deed whatever interest in the Dixons' home he had acquired by the sheriff's tax deed. The trial court granted Conway's motion to dismiss. We reverse.

The Dixons contend that because Conway failed to follow the notice requirements of OCGA § 48-4-46, Conway's motion to dismiss should not have been granted. OCGA § 48-4-46 requires a purchaser at a tax sale to deliver to the sheriff of the county in which the land is located the notice and a list of persons to be served at least 45 days before the date set in the notice for the expiration of the right to redeem. Within 15 days of delivery to him, the sheriff is required to personally serve notice on the persons included on the list. Thus, persons on the list are entitled to receive notice of the foreclosure of the right to redeem at least 30 days in advance of the final date. Laws of this state governing the right to redeem are to be construed liberally and most favorably to persons allowed by the statute to redeem. Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Bank of Tignall, 182 Ga. 233, 235 ( 185 S.E. 108) (1935). James Dixon was served on March 9, 1992; the notice of the bar of redemption listed March 31, 1992 as the final redemption date. As James Dixon was not provided advance notice of 30 days as required by the statute, the bar of redemption must be set aside and the Dixons must be given an opportunity to redeem the property.

Our resolution of this point makes consideration of the remaining enumerations of error unnecessary.

Judgment reversed. Clarke, C. J., Benham, Fletcher, Sears-Collins, JJ., and Judge Ben J. Miller concur; Hunstein, J., not participating.


DECIDED FEBRUARY 5, 1993.


Summaries of

Dixon v. Conway

Supreme Court of Georgia
Feb 5, 1993
262 Ga. 709 (Ga. 1993)
Case details for

Dixon v. Conway

Case Details

Full title:DIXON et al. v. CONWAY

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Feb 5, 1993

Citations

262 Ga. 709 (Ga. 1993)
425 S.E.2d 651

Citing Cases

United Capital Financial of Atlanta, LLC v. American Investment Associates, Inc.

It follows that, based on a literal interpretation of the statute, United Capital had a first lien for the…

Saffo v. Foxworthy

At the expiration of the 12-month period, the new owner has the ability to terminate and forever bar the…