From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ditmer v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Jun 10, 2009
Case No. 3:08-cv-270 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 10, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 3:08-cv-270.

June 10, 2009


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. No. 10), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) expired on June 8, 2009, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision that Plaintiff is not disabled and therefore not entitled to benefits under the Social Security Act be, and it hereby is, affirmed. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the Complaint with prejudice.


Summaries of

Ditmer v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Jun 10, 2009
Case No. 3:08-cv-270 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 10, 2009)
Case details for

Ditmer v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ALLISON R. DITMER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Jun 10, 2009

Citations

Case No. 3:08-cv-270 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 10, 2009)