From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dispositons of Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Sep 1, 1999
743 A.2d 912 (Pa. 1999)

Opinion

September 1999.


Allocatur Disposition Lower Court Docket and Appeal Docket or Title Date Number Docket Citation ___________________ _______ ________ ___________ ____________

Tucker v. Seven Springs Mountain Resort ........ 9/20/1999 818 Denied Pa.Super., W.D. 731 A.2d 205 (1998) U.S. Centrifugal, Inc. v. SKF USA, Inc. .. 9/29/1999 0652 Denied Pa.Super., M.D. 739 A.2d 600 (1999) Wasilewski v. Loobey ..... 9/10/1999 305 Denied Pa.Super., M.D. 737 A.2d 1289 (1999) Wecht v. P.G. Pub. Co.; P.G. Pub. Co., In re .................. 9/28/1999 193 Cross-pet. Pa.Super., W.D. Denied 725 A.2d 788 (1999) Western Pennsylvania Hosp. v. Hamil Mfg. Co. .................... 9/7/1999 119 Denied Pa.Super., W.D. 736 A.2d 692 (1999) Williams v. Hockman ...... 9/20/1999 103 Denied Pa.Super., M.D. 736 A.2d 25 (1999) Yaroszewski v. Hughes .... 9/29/1999 430 Denied Pa.Super., W.D. 739 A.2d 600 (1999)

Appeal from the Commonwealth Court

Allocatur Disposition Lower Court Docket and Appeal Docket or Title Date Number Docket Citation ___________________ _______ ________ ___________ ____________

ABB Power TD Co., Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Review ................. 9/28/1999 394 Denied No. 2585 C.D. M.D. 1998 (1999) Acme Markets, Inc. v. W.C.A.B. (Johnson and Peterson, M.D.) .... 9/24/1999 332 Denied Pa.Cmwlth., M.D. 725 A.2d 863 (1999)


Summaries of

Dispositons of Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Sep 1, 1999
743 A.2d 912 (Pa. 1999)
Case details for

Dispositons of Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Case Details

Full title:DISPOSITONS OF PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 1, 1999

Citations

743 A.2d 912 (Pa. 1999)
743 A.2d 912

Citing Cases

Hayfield v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

In a malicious prosecution action, compensatory damages may include, inter alia, harm to reputation, mental…

AT&T v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Fourth, Employer argues that the decision of the WCJ is not supported by substantial evidence because Dr.…