From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disposition of Petitions for Leave to Appeal

Supreme Court of Illinois
Jan 1, 1992
144 Ill. 2d 631 (Ill. 1992)

Opinion

1992.


MARCH TERM, 1992

(73200) Airco Industrial Gas Division v. Department of Revenue No. 4-91-0313, filed 12/30/91 ........................... Denied.

(71711) Allison v. Fluor Engineers, Inc. No. 1-90-0781, filed 03/28/91 ................ Denied with order.

In the exercise of this Court's supervisory authority, the judgment of the Appellate Court is reversed. The order of the Circuit Court is reversed. This cause is remanded to the Circuit Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's opinion in Harvel v. City of Johnston City (1992), 146 Ill.2d 277.

(73152) Argueta v. Baltimore Ohio Chicago Terminal R.R. Co. No. 1-89-2813, filed 12/19/91 ........................... Denied.

(73101) Artoe v. Levin Bros. Paper Corp. Miscellaneous Order No. 1-90-3353, filed 12/12/91 ....... Denied.

(73252) Benefit Trust Life Insurance Co. v. Gherna Rule 23 Order No. 4-91-0362, filed 01/24/92 ............. Denied.

(73188) Booth v. J.I. Case Co. Miscellaneous Order No. 1-91-2185, filed 12/26/91 ....................................... Dismissed.

(73165) Camillo v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. No. 5-90-0254, filed 11/25/91 ........................... Denied.

(73092) Caster v. Richmond Rule 23 Order No. 1-90-1452, filed 12/09/91 ............. Denied.

(72496) Castorena v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Illinois, Inc. No. 2-90-1049, filed 08/09/91 ................ Denied with order.


Summaries of

Disposition of Petitions for Leave to Appeal

Supreme Court of Illinois
Jan 1, 1992
144 Ill. 2d 631 (Ill. 1992)
Case details for

Disposition of Petitions for Leave to Appeal

Case Details

Full title:DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

Court:Supreme Court of Illinois

Date published: Jan 1, 1992

Citations

144 Ill. 2d 631 (Ill. 1992)

Citing Cases

Thompson v. Cook Co. Forest Preserve Dist

Notably, plaintiff here does not allege that the Forest Preserve negligently maintained its posted signs or…

Opper v. Brotz

First, an agreement may be set aside only by satisfying a high standard of proof, i.e., clear and convincing…