Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review

Full title: DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 7, 1999

351 N.C. 104 (N.C. 1999)

351 N.C. 104

Opinion

540 S.E.2d 361 (N.C. 1999) 351 N.C. 104 Walter L. HOISINGTON, as Guardian Ad Litem for Jill Lee Marker, an Incompetent v. Kalvin Michael SMITH, Zaremba Group, Incorporated, ZT-Winston-Salem Associates, Zaremba Associates Limited Partnership, Zaremba Realty Corporation, Toys "R" Us-Delaware, Inc., Winston-Salem Retail Associates Limited Partnership, and The Wackenhut Corporation and Zaremba Group, Incorporated, ZT-Winston-Salem Associates, Zaremba Associates Limited Partnership, Zaremba Realty Corporation, Toys "R" Us-Delaware, Inc., and Winston-Salem Retail Associates Limited Partnershipates, Zaremba Associates Limited Partnership, Zaremba Realty Corporation, Toys "R" Us-Delaware, Inc., and Winston-Salem Retail Associates Limited Partnership. v. The Tree Factory, Inc., d/b/a The Silk Plant Forest. No. 339PA99. Supreme Court of North Carolina October 7, 1999

         Joseph W. Moss, Matthew L. Mason, Greensboro, for ZT-Winston-Salem Associates, Zaremba Associates Limited Partnership, Zaremba Realty Corporation, Toys" R" Us-Delaware, Inc., and Winston-Salem Retail Associates Limited Partnership.

         Allan R. Gitter, Richard T. Rice, Jack M. Strauch, Winston-Salem, for the Wackenhut Corporation.

         Paul C. Lawrence, Charlotte, for Tree Factory & Silk Plant.

         Prior report: 133 N.C.App. 485, 516 S.E.2d 176.

          ORDER

         Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

Page 362.

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th day of October 1999."

         Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

         Plaintiff shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.