From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 2001
355 N.C. 221 (N.C. 2001)

Summary

holding that where form AOC-CR-305 provided two blanks for "the judge's signature, one directly underneath the judgment, and the other located at the bottom of the form below the section giving notice of appeal" and the "judge signed the second signature area at the bottom of the form, this was sufficient to constitute signing the judgment and that defendant was not prejudiced thereby"

Summary of this case from In the Matter Of: D.D.F

Opinion

2001


Summaries of

Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 2001
355 N.C. 221 (N.C. 2001)

holding that where form AOC-CR-305 provided two blanks for "the judge's signature, one directly underneath the judgment, and the other located at the bottom of the form below the section giving notice of appeal" and the "judge signed the second signature area at the bottom of the form, this was sufficient to constitute signing the judgment and that defendant was not prejudiced thereby"

Summary of this case from In the Matter Of: D.D.F
Case details for

Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review

Case Details

Full title:DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 2001

Citations

355 N.C. 221 (N.C. 2001)
560 S.E.2d 359

Citing Cases

Stevens v. N.C. D.O.C

6. Plaintiff filed for Writ of Certiorari on September 14, 2001, with the State Supreme Court, praying that…

State v. Zubiena

In exercising its discretion to impose a fine, a "trial court must take into account the nature of the crime,…