From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 1, 1991
62 Ohio St. 3d 1469 (Ohio 1991)

Summary

finding the commission did not err when it failed to renew the liquor permit of a bar that was located in a high crime area and the bar, at least by inaction, was a contributing factor to drug activity

Summary of this case from Marciano v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm.

Opinion

1991.


Summaries of

DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 1, 1991
62 Ohio St. 3d 1469 (Ohio 1991)

finding the commission did not err when it failed to renew the liquor permit of a bar that was located in a high crime area and the bar, at least by inaction, was a contributing factor to drug activity

Summary of this case from Marciano v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm.
Case details for

DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE

Case Details

Full title:DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jan 1, 1991

Citations

62 Ohio St. 3d 1469 (Ohio 1991)

Citing Cases

Marciano v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm.

{¶ 29} Several courts have rejected arguments similar to those appellant raises. See Leo G. Keffalas, Inc. v.…

In re One New England, Pardner, Shotgun

Furthermore, the language in R.C. 2923.13(A)(3) referring to "any offense involving * * * any drug of abuse"…