From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Discover Bank v. Kaminsky

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 28, 2006
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 51274 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)

Opinion

2005-1543 NC.

Decided June 28, 2006.

Appeal from an order of the District Court of Nassau County, First District (Martin J. Massel, J.), entered June 22, 2005. The order denied defendant's motion for reargument.

Appeal dismissed.

PRESENT:: ANGIOLILLO, J.P., McCABE and TANENBAUM, JJ


Defendant's appeal from an order denying his motion for reargument must be dismissed as the denial of such a motion is not appealable ( see Kahlke v. Buscemi, 12 AD3d 488). We further note that to the extent defendant seeks to appeal the denial of his application for an order to show cause seeking to quash an information subpoena, no appeal lies therefrom ( see UDCA 1702 [a] [2]; Poplar Realty v. Po, 3 Misc 3d 22 [App Term, 2d 11th Jud Dists 2003]; cf. CPLR 5704 [b]).

Angiolillo, J.P., McCabe and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Discover Bank v. Kaminsky

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 28, 2006
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 51274 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)
Case details for

Discover Bank v. Kaminsky

Case Details

Full title:DISCOVER BANK, Respondent, v. NORMAN KAMINSKY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 28, 2006

Citations

2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 51274 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)