From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disciplinary Counsel v. Watson

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 20, 2005
105 Ohio St. 3d 1553 (Ohio 2005)

Opinion

No. 2005-0398.

May 20, 2005.


DISCIPLINARY CASES

This matter is pending before the court upon the filing on February 28, 2005, of the report and recommendation of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline regarding respondent, Michael Troy Watson. On April 18, 2005, respondent filed a motion to show cause why E. Yvonne Harris should not be held in contempt for failure to appear at an October 26, 2004, hearing. Ms. Harris filed a response on April 28, 2005. On April 18, 2005, respondent also filed a motion to show cause why Bruce Hodge should not be found in contempt for failure to appear at an October 26, 2004, hearing. Mr. Hodge did not file a response. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motions of respondent be, and hereby are, denied.

RESNICK, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Disciplinary Counsel v. Watson

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 20, 2005
105 Ohio St. 3d 1553 (Ohio 2005)
Case details for

Disciplinary Counsel v. Watson

Case Details

Full title:DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WATSON

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: May 20, 2005

Citations

105 Ohio St. 3d 1553 (Ohio 2005)
2005 Ohio 2424