From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disciplinary Counsel v. Rothermel

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 9, 1999
716 N.E.2d 712 (Ohio 1999)

Opinion

No. DD 84-20.

Submitted September 9, 1999.

Decided September 9, 1999.

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.


This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Christian Dean Rothermel, Attorney Registration No. 0043140, last known business address in Trenton, Ohio.

The court coming now to consider its order of December 31, 1984, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V, former Section 6(C), suspended respondent for a period of one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that respondent, Christian Dean Rothermel, be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Rothermel (1984), 15 Ohio St.3d 121, 15 OBR 272, 472 N.E.2d 1072.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Disciplinary Counsel v. Rothermel

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 9, 1999
716 N.E.2d 712 (Ohio 1999)
Case details for

Disciplinary Counsel v. Rothermel

Case Details

Full title:Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rothermel

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Sep 9, 1999

Citations

716 N.E.2d 712 (Ohio 1999)
86 Ohio St. 3d 1215

Citing Cases

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Rothermel

Disciplinary Counsel v. Rothermel (1984), 15 Ohio St.3d 121, 15 OBR 272, 472 N.E.2d 1072. Respondent did not…

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Rothermel

See Disciplinary Counsel v. Rothermel (1984), 15 Ohio St.3d 121, 15 OBR 272, 472 N.E.2d 1072. Respondent was…