From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mcneal

Supreme Court of Ohio.
May 9, 2013
991 N.E.2d 237 (Ohio 2013)

Opinion

No. 2011–1732.

2013-05-9

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. McNEAL.


On Application for Reinstatement.

[Ohio St.3d 1205]{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Earl Darren McNeal, Attorney Registration No. 0059218, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court, coming now to consider its order of March 1, 2012, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

O'CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O'NEILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mcneal

Supreme Court of Ohio.
May 9, 2013
991 N.E.2d 237 (Ohio 2013)
Case details for

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mcneal

Case Details

Full title:DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. McNEAL.

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio.

Date published: May 9, 2013

Citations

991 N.E.2d 237 (Ohio 2013)
136 Ohio St. 3d 1205