From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disciplinary Counsel v. Maxwell

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 31, 1999
707 N.E.2d 1131 (Ohio 1999)

Opinion

No. 97-2185.

March 31, 1999.

On August 12, 1998, this court suspended respondent, David Clay Maxwell, Attorney Registration No. 0039122, last known business address in Newark, Ohio, for a period of two years, with one year of the suspension to be stayed on conditions. On January 25, 1999, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a motion requesting this court to issue an order directing respondent to appear and show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failing to obey this court's August 12, 1998 order. Upon consideration thereof,


IT IS ORDERED by this court that the motion be, and is hereby granted to the extent that respondent show cause by filing a written response with the Clerk of this court on or before twenty days from the date of this order why respondent should not be held in contempt.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that all document's filed with this court in this case shall meet the tiling requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings.


Summaries of

Disciplinary Counsel v. Maxwell

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 31, 1999
707 N.E.2d 1131 (Ohio 1999)
Case details for

Disciplinary Counsel v. Maxwell

Case Details

Full title:Disciplinary Counsel v. Maxwell

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Mar 31, 1999

Citations

707 N.E.2d 1131 (Ohio 1999)
707 N.E.2d 1131