From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disciplinary Counsel v. Margolis

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 4, 2010
124 Ohio St. 3d 1220 (Ohio 2010)

Opinion

No. 2006-2331.

Submitted February 25, 2010.

Decided March 4, 2010.

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.


{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Loren Jonathan Margolis, Attorney Registration No. 0007957, last known business address in Cleveland, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of July 18, 2007, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Margolis, 114 Ohio St.3d 165, 2007-Ohio-3607, 870 N.E.2d 1158.

MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Disciplinary Counsel v. Margolis

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 4, 2010
124 Ohio St. 3d 1220 (Ohio 2010)
Case details for

Disciplinary Counsel v. Margolis

Case Details

Full title:DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MARGOLIS

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Mar 4, 2010

Citations

124 Ohio St. 3d 1220 (Ohio 2010)
2010 Ohio 1049