From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disciplinary Counsel v. Lombardi

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 22, 2003
782 N.E.2d 1161 (Ohio 2003)

Opinion

No. 2002-0325.

Submitted January 17, 2003.

Decided January 22, 2003.

On Application for Reinstatement.


{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Marcus M. Lombardi, Attorney Registration No. 0042349, last known business address in Akron, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of July 3, 2002, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years with 18 months stayed, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that Marcus M. Lombardi be and hereby is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Lombardi, 96 Ohio St.3d 54, 2002-Ohio-2990, 770 N.E.2d 1013.

MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK, LUNDBERG STRATTON and O'CONNOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Disciplinary Counsel v. Lombardi

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 22, 2003
782 N.E.2d 1161 (Ohio 2003)
Case details for

Disciplinary Counsel v. Lombardi

Case Details

Full title:Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lombardi

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jan 22, 2003

Citations

782 N.E.2d 1161 (Ohio 2003)
98 Ohio St. 3d 1205