From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disciplinary Counsel v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 4, 1999
706 N.E.2d 792 (Ohio 1999)

Opinion

No. 97-1754.

March 4, 1999.

On February 19, 1999, respondent Inza E. Johnson filed an application for reinstatement to the practice of law. Respondent attached to her application a document titled "Objections to the Findings and Recommendation of the Board." Whereas objections to the findings and recommendations of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline were due no later than September 25, 1997, respondent's submission of the objections at this time is prohibited by S. Ct. Prac. R. XIV(1)(C). Accordingly,


IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that respondent's application for reinstatement be, and hereby is, stricken.


Summaries of

Disciplinary Counsel v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 4, 1999
706 N.E.2d 792 (Ohio 1999)
Case details for

Disciplinary Counsel v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:Disciplinary Counsel v. Johnson

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Mar 4, 1999

Citations

706 N.E.2d 792 (Ohio 1999)
706 N.E.2d 792