From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disciplinary Counsel v. Holzer

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 3, 1998
695 N.E.2d 260 (Ohio 1998)

Opinion

No. 96-1965

Submitted and decided June 3, 1998.

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.


This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent Richard Jean Holzer, Attorney Registration No. 0018814, last known address in Englewood, Ohio.

The court coming now to consider its order of April 30, 1997, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that Richard Jean Holzer be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified cost of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Holzer (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 309, 677 N.E.2d 1186.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Disciplinary Counsel v. Holzer

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 3, 1998
695 N.E.2d 260 (Ohio 1998)
Case details for

Disciplinary Counsel v. Holzer

Case Details

Full title:OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HOLZER

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jun 3, 1998

Citations

695 N.E.2d 260 (Ohio 1998)
82 Ohio St. 3d 1216