From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disciplinary Counsel v. Golden

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Jun 1, 2022
168 Ohio St. 3d 1214 (Ohio 2022)

Opinion

No. 2012-0764

06-01-2022

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. GOLDEN.


{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Kenneth Louis Golden, Attorney Registration No. 0078441, last known address in West Hollywood, California.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of July 12, 2012, wherein the court, pursuant to former Gov.Bar R. V(11), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of two years with 21 months stayed and ordered that he would not be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio until he was reinstated to the practice of law in the state of California, finds that respondent has complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2).

{¶ 5} For previous case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Golden , 132 Ohio St.3d 1236, 2012-Ohio-3149, 972 N.E.2d 599.

O'Connor, C.J., and Kennedy, Fischer, DeWine, Donnelly, Stewart, and Brunner, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Disciplinary Counsel v. Golden

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Jun 1, 2022
168 Ohio St. 3d 1214 (Ohio 2022)
Case details for

Disciplinary Counsel v. Golden

Case Details

Full title:DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. GOLDEN.

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio.

Date published: Jun 1, 2022

Citations

168 Ohio St. 3d 1214 (Ohio 2022)
196 N.E.3d 870