From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disciplinary Counsel v. Donnell

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 16, 1998
695 N.E.2d 775 (Ohio 1998)

Opinion

No. 96-2810

Submitted and decided June 16, 1998.

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.


This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent Walton Halleck Donnell, Attorney Registration No. 0020371, last known address in Woodville, Ohio.

The court coming now to consider its order of October 1, 1997, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that Walton Halleck Donnell be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Donnell (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 501, 684 N.E.2d 36.

DOUGLAS, ACTING C.J., F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

MOYER, C.J., and RESNICK, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Disciplinary Counsel v. Donnell

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 16, 1998
695 N.E.2d 775 (Ohio 1998)
Case details for

Disciplinary Counsel v. Donnell

Case Details

Full title:OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. DONNELL

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jun 16, 1998

Citations

695 N.E.2d 775 (Ohio 1998)
695 N.E.2d 775