From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disciplinary Counsel v. Cartwright

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 6, 1988
521 N.E.2d 459 (Ohio 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-1

Decided April 6, 1988.

ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Judiciary.


Although a review of the record herein reveals no purposeful violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct, the facts constitute a technical violation of Canon 7(A)(1)(b) as found by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Judiciary. Accordingly, the minimum sanction of a public reprimand is hereby imposed upon respondent, Judge Herman Gallup Cartwright.

MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, LOCHER, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT and H. BROWN, JJ., concur.

HOLMES, J., dissents.


In that I conclude that the facts present no violation of the Canons, I would not apply any sanction.


Summaries of

Disciplinary Counsel v. Cartwright

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 6, 1988
521 N.E.2d 459 (Ohio 1988)
Case details for

Disciplinary Counsel v. Cartwright

Case Details

Full title:OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. CARTWRIGHT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Apr 6, 1988

Citations

521 N.E.2d 459 (Ohio 1988)
521 N.E.2d 459