From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disciplinary Counsel v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 29, 2011
128 Ohio St. 3d 1220 (Ohio 2011)

Opinion

No. 2009-1100.

Submitted April 19, 2011.

Decided April 29, 2011.

ON PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT.


{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing on November 2, 2010, of a petition for reinstatement by respondent, Clyde Bennett, Attorney Registration No. 0059910. In accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(10)(F), respondent's petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. The board filed its final report in this court on March 1, 2011, recommending that respondent be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio. No objections to the final report were filed.

{¶ 2} Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by this court that the petition for reinstatement of respondent is granted and that respondent, Clyde Bennett, last known address in Mason, Ohio, is reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio.

{¶ 3} It is further ordered by the court that respondent be taxed the costs of these proceedings in the amount of $897.08, less the deposit of $500, for a total balance due of $397.08 payable, by certified check or money order, by respondent on or before 90 days from the date of this order. If costs are not paid on or before 90 days from the date of this order, interest at the rate of 10 percent per annum will accrue until costs are paid in full. It is further ordered that if costs are not paid in full on or before 90 days from the date of this order, the matter may be referred to the Attorney General for collection, and respondent may be found in contempt and suspended until all costs and accrued interest are paid in full.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that within 90 days of the date of this order, respondent shall reimburse any amounts that have been awarded against respondent by the Clients' Security Fund pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F). It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that if, after the date of this order, the Clients' Security Fund awards any amount against respondent pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F), respondent shall reimburse that amount to the Clients' Security Fund within 90 days of the notice of such award.

{¶ 5} It is further ordered, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings. All case documents are subject to Rules 44 through 47 of the Rules of Superintendence for the Courts of Ohio, which govern access to court records.

{¶ 6} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 7} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Bennett, 124 Ohio St.3d 314, 2010-Ohio-313, 921 N.E.2d 1064.

O'CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Disciplinary Counsel v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 29, 2011
128 Ohio St. 3d 1220 (Ohio 2011)
Case details for

Disciplinary Counsel v. Bennett

Case Details

Full title:DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BENNETT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Apr 29, 2011

Citations

128 Ohio St. 3d 1220 (Ohio 2011)
2011 Ohio 2248

Citing Cases

Disciplinary Counsel v. Bennett

Consequently, we suspended his license to practice law on an interim basis on February 15, 2008. In re…