Opinion
No. 2023-0177
01-26-2024
Disciplinary Counsel v. Estadt.
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, John Robert Estadt, Attorney Registration No. 0016397, last known business address in St. Clairsville, Ohio.
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of July 12, 2023, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of six months, finds that respondent has complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).
{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2).
{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Estadt, 172 Ohio St.3d 391, 2023-Ohio-2347, 224 N.E.3d 43.
Kennedy, C.J., and Fischer, DeWine, Donnelly, Stewart, Brunner, and Deters, JJ., concur.