From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DiSanto v. Town of Islip

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 6, 1995
212 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 6, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, and the complaint and cross claims insofar as asserted against the Town of Islip are reinstated; and it is further,

Ordered that the appellant is awarded one bill of costs payable by the Town of Islip.

The plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident which allegedly occurred as a result of, among other things, the defendant Town of Islip's negligent maintenance of a stop sign which it permitted to become obscured by the foliage of a nearby tree. Contrary to the conclusion of the Supreme Court, "[s]ince the gravamen of the claims against the [Town] was that untrimmed vegetation obstructed a stop sign, thus rendering the sign defective, [Town Law § 65-a (1)] does not apply" (Torres v. Galvin, 189 A.D.2d 870, 871; see, Dishaw v. Central N Y Regional Transp. Auth., 179 A.D.2d 1088; De Francisci v Baron, 97 A.D.2d 453). Therefore, the court erred insofar as it determined that the absence of prior written notice compelled the dismissal of the claims against the Town. Furthermore, the alleged dangerous condition was open and obvious on a public street. We are therefore satisfied that the plaintiff has demonstrated the existence of an issue of fact as to whether or not the Town had constructive notice thereof (see, Harris v Village of E. Hills, 41 N.Y.2d 446).

The appellant's remaining contentions are academic. Miller, J.P., O'Brien, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

DiSanto v. Town of Islip

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 6, 1995
212 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

DiSanto v. Town of Islip

Case Details

Full title:DEBRA J. DiSANTO, Appellant, v. TOWN OF ISLIP et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 6, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
622 N.Y.S.2d 313

Citing Cases

Amacio v. Gaudiuso

Those courts have consistently held that an obstructed stop sign is defective and, therefore, statutes…

Armbrecht v. Town of Brookhaven

Plaintiffs' submissions include the deposition transcript of Thomas Sternberg on behalf of the Town who…