From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Directv, Inc. v. Henderson

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Jul 14, 2004
Case No. C 03-2410 SI (N.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2004)

Opinion

Case No. C 03-2410 SI.

July 14, 2004

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER HEDGES, LLP, Dale H. Oliver, Michael E. Williams, Los Angeles, California, Jennifer A. Kash, San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Plaintiff, DIRECTV, Inc.


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PERMANENT INJUNCTION RE DEFENDANT CATHY HENDERSON


It is hereby stipulated by and among the parties, through their respective counsel, that the following Permanent Injunction be entered by the Court without further notice or process:

1. Defendant Cathy Henderson, and any persons or entities controlled directly or indirectly by her, is hereby permanently enjoined and restrained from:

(a) receiving or assisting others in receiving DIRECTV's satellite transmissions of television programming without authorization by and payment to DIRECTV;
(b) designing, manufacturing, assembling, modifying, importing, exporting, possessing, offering to the public, trafficking, distributing or selling any devices or equipment (including, by way of example, loaders, bootloaders, unloopers, emulators, programmers, reader/writers, or software or components therefor) designed or intended to facilitate the reception and decryption of DIRECTV's satellite transmissions of television programming by persons not authorized to receive such programming;
(c) advertising the sale of any devices or equipment (including, by way of example, loaders, bootloaders, unloopers, emulators, programmers, reader/writers, or software or components therefor) designed or intended to facilitate the reception and decryption of DIRECTV's satellite transmissions of television programming by persons not authorized to receive such programming, and advertising or providing information or technical services in support thereof; or
(d) reverse engineering or attempting to reverse engineer any of DIRECTV's products, services or technologies, including without limitation, the encryption and security controls for the DIRECTV satellite system.

2. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to entertain such further proceedings and to enter such further orders as may be necessary or appropriate to implement and/or enforce the provisions of this Permanent Injunction notwithstanding any stipulated dismissal of the action filed by the parties.

3. Upon proof of any violation by Defendant Cathy Henderson of the provisions of this Permanent Injunction, the Court shall be authorized to award damages to DIRECTV for losses sustained subsequent to the date of this Permanent Injunction, in addition to any other damages or other relief authorized by law.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Directv, Inc. v. Henderson

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Jul 14, 2004
Case No. C 03-2410 SI (N.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2004)
Case details for

Directv, Inc. v. Henderson

Case Details

Full title:DIRECTV, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. CATHY HENDERSON…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Jul 14, 2004

Citations

Case No. C 03-2410 SI (N.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2004)