From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DIRECTV, INC. v. DO

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Jan 30, 2006
Case No. 3:03cv00425 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 30, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 3:03cv00425.

January 30, 2006


DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FILED ON DECEMBER 30, 2005 (Doc. #10); PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (Doc. #5) IS GRANTED IN PART, AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT CHUCK DO; DEFENDANT CHUCK DO IS ORDERED TO PAY PLAINTIFF'S REASONABLE ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $500.50; PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (Doc. #5) IS DENIED IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE PENDING LIMITED DISCOVERY ANALOGOUS TO A CREDITOR'S EXAMINATION; PLAINTIFF SHALL COMPLETE THIS LIMITED DISCOVERY BY MARCH 3, 2006 AND SHALL FILE A MOTION, IF ANY, DIRECTED TO DAMAGES BY MARCH 30, 2006


The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #10), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and nothing that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

It is therefore ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendations filed on December 30, 2005 (Doc. #10) is ADOPTED in full;
2. Plaintiff DIRECTV, Inc.'s Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. #5) is GRANTED in part and Default Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff DIRECTV, Inc. and against Defendant Chuck Do under Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(b)(2);
3. Defendant Chuck Do is ordered to pay DIRECTV's reasonable attorney fees and costs in the amount of $500.50;
4. Plaintiff DIRECTV's Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. #5) is DENIED in part without prejudice pending limited discovery analogous to a creditor's examination;
5. Plaintiff shall complete limited discovery on the issue of damages by March 3, 2006 ;
6. Plaintiff shall file a Motion, if any, directed to damages by March 30, 2006 ; and
7. If Plaintiff files a Motion directed to damages, Defendant shall file his Memorandum in Opposition, if any, within twenty-one days after service of Plaintiff's Motion.


Summaries of

DIRECTV, INC. v. DO

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Jan 30, 2006
Case No. 3:03cv00425 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 30, 2006)
Case details for

DIRECTV, INC. v. DO

Case Details

Full title:DIRECTV, INC., Plaintiff, v. CHUCK DO, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Jan 30, 2006

Citations

Case No. 3:03cv00425 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 30, 2006)