From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dir., Off. of Wrks. Compensation v. Hamilton

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Dec 18, 1989
890 F.2d 1143 (11th Cir. 1989)

Opinion

No. 89-8391. Non-Argument Calendar.

December 18, 1989.

Nathaniel I. Spiller, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Allen H. Feldman, Charles I. Hadden, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Ralph Lorberbaum, Ashman Zipperer, Savannah, Ga., for respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, and KRAVITCH and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.


The decision in this case is governed by binding precedent of the former Fifth Circuit: Holliday v. Todd Shipyards Corp., 654 F.2d 415 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981). The Director, in his brief, acknowledges such, and, further, that we must affirm the decision of the Benefits Review Board unless this court, sitting en banc, overrules Holliday. The Board's decision is affirmed, without prejudice to the Director's right to petition the court for rehearing en banc.

In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc), this court adopted as binding precedent all decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to October 1, 1981.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Dir., Off. of Wrks. Compensation v. Hamilton

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Dec 18, 1989
890 F.2d 1143 (11th Cir. 1989)
Case details for

Dir., Off. of Wrks. Compensation v. Hamilton

Case Details

Full title:DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKER'S COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Dec 18, 1989

Citations

890 F.2d 1143 (11th Cir. 1989)

Citing Cases

Southeastern Maritime Company v. Brown

Our holding in Holliday, however, has been reaffirmed by the Eleventh Circuit subsequent to the circuit…