From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DiNunzio v. Zylinski

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Aug 22, 2019
175 A.D.3d 1092 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

721 CAF 18–00299

08-22-2019

In the Matter of Michael E. DINUNZIO, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Charlene N. ZYLINSKI, Respondent–Appellant. (Appeal No. 6.)

CHARLES J. GREENBERG, AMHERST, FOR RESPONDENT–APPELLANT. HOGANWILLIG, PLLC, AMHERST (REBECCA M. KUJAWA OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER–RESPONDENT. KELLY L. BALL, BUFFALO, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD.


CHARLES J. GREENBERG, AMHERST, FOR RESPONDENT–APPELLANT.

HOGANWILLIG, PLLC, AMHERST (REBECCA M. KUJAWA OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER–RESPONDENT.

KELLY L. BALL, BUFFALO, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND CURRAN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of DiNunzio v. Zylinski ( [appeal No. 1]—AD3d—[Aug. 22, 2019] [4th Dept 2019] ).


Summaries of

DiNunzio v. Zylinski

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Aug 22, 2019
175 A.D.3d 1092 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

DiNunzio v. Zylinski

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Michael E. DINUNZIO, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Charlene…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 22, 2019

Citations

175 A.D.3d 1092 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
105 N.Y.S.3d 342