DINNY ROBBINS, INC v. RETAIL SHOE SALESMEN'S UN

Full title: DINNY ROBBINS, INC., Respondent, Appellant, v. RETAIL SHOE SALESMEN'S…

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 19, 1942

264 App. Div. 375 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

35 N.Y.S.2d 598

Opinion

June 19, 1942.

Appeal from Supreme Court of New York County, CAREW, J.

Leon Reich of counsel [ Simon J. Liebowitz with him on the brief; Liebowitz Schuman, attorneys], for the appellant-respondent.

Samuel J. Robbins, for the respondent-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The complaint alleges and the evidence establishes the existence of a labor dispute within the meaning of section 876-a of the Civil Practice Act. The plaintiff's failure to comply with the provisions of that section requires the reversal of the judgment and the dismissal of the complaint.

The judgment should be reversed, with costs to the defendant-appellant-respondent, and the complaint dismissed, with costs.

UNTERMYER, COHN and CALLAHAN, JJ., concur; MARTIN, P.J., and DORE, J., dissent.

Judgment reversed, with costs to the defendant-appellant-respondent, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. Settle order on notice, reversing findings inconsistent with this determination, and containing such new findings of fact proved upon the trial as are necessary to sustain the judgment hereby awarded.