From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dinkins v. State Farm Gen. Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 30, 2022
CV 22-0295 FMO (PVCx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2022)

Opinion

CV 22-0295 FMO (PVCx)

11-30-2022

JAMES DINKINS, et al., Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

FERNANDO M. OLGUIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, (Dkt. 23, Notice of Settlement), IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown by no later than December 30, 2022, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action with prejudice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962).


Summaries of

Dinkins v. State Farm Gen. Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 30, 2022
CV 22-0295 FMO (PVCx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2022)
Case details for

Dinkins v. State Farm Gen. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES DINKINS, et al., Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Nov 30, 2022

Citations

CV 22-0295 FMO (PVCx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2022)