From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dinkins v. Region Ten CSB

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 24, 2020
No. 20-1274 (4th Cir. Aug. 24, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-1274

08-24-2020

MELVIN DINKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. REGION TEN CSB, Defendant - Appellee.

Melvin Dinkins, Appellant Pro Se. James Morton Bowling, ST. JOHN, BOWLING & LAWRENCE, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (3:19-cv-00030-NKM) Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Melvin Dinkins, Appellant Pro Se. James Morton Bowling, ST. JOHN, BOWLING & LAWRENCE, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Melvin Dinkins appeals the district court's orders dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and denying his postjudgment motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dinkins v. Region Ten CSB, No. 3:19-cv-00030-NKM (W.D. Va. Feb. 18, 2020 & March 5, 2020). We deny Dinkins' motion to expedite, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Dinkins v. Region Ten CSB

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 24, 2020
No. 20-1274 (4th Cir. Aug. 24, 2020)
Case details for

Dinkins v. Region Ten CSB

Case Details

Full title:MELVIN DINKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. REGION TEN CSB, Defendant …

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 24, 2020

Citations

No. 20-1274 (4th Cir. Aug. 24, 2020)