From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dinapoli v. Bd. of Appeals of Queen Anne's Cnty.

COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND
Mar 9, 2016
446 Md. 575 (Md. 2016)

Opinion

No. 66,

03-09-2016

Michael A. DINAPOLI, et al. v. BOARD OF APPEALS OF QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY, et al.

Rosemary Greene (Queen Anne's Conservation Association, Centreville, MD), on brief, for Petitioners. Charles O. Monk, II (John B. Howard, Jr., Saul Ewing, LLP, Baltimore, MD), on brief, for Respondents. Mark F. Gabler (Warren K. Rich, Rich and Henderson, P.C., Annapolis, MD), on brief, for Respondents.


Rosemary Greene (Queen Anne's Conservation Association, Centreville, MD), on brief, for Petitioners.

Charles O. Monk, II (John B. Howard, Jr., Saul Ewing, LLP, Baltimore, MD), on brief, for Respondents.

Mark F. Gabler (Warren K. Rich, Rich and Henderson, P.C., Annapolis, MD), on brief, for Respondents.

Opinion

PER CURIAM ORDER.

The petition for writ of certiorari in the above-entitled case having been granted and argued, it is this 9th day of March, 2016,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.


Summaries of

Dinapoli v. Bd. of Appeals of Queen Anne's Cnty.

COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND
Mar 9, 2016
446 Md. 575 (Md. 2016)
Case details for

Dinapoli v. Bd. of Appeals of Queen Anne's Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL A. DINAPOLI, et al. v. BOARD OF APPEALS OF QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY, et…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND

Date published: Mar 9, 2016

Citations

446 Md. 575 (Md. 2016)
133 A.3d 261