Opinion
Case No. 1:06 CV 2506.
November 9, 2007
ORDER
James A Dina has petitioned this Court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, in which he challenges the constitutional sufficiency of his state court conviction for theft. Dina's petition was referred to a magistrate judge of this Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rule 72.2(b)(2).
Upon review of the parties' submissions, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation ("R R") (Doc. 12), in which she recommends that Dina's petition be denied. Dina has not filed any objections to the R R. Because the Court reaches the same conclusions as the magistrate judge, no further articulation of its reasoning is required. Tuggle v. Seabold, 806 F.2d 87, 92-93 (6th Cir. 1986).
Nor, as the magistrate judge observed, did Dina elect to file a traverse.
Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the magistrate judge's R R. Dina's petition is DENIED and his case, is DISMISSED.