From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dimas v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Nov 25, 2014
NO. 09-14-00018-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 25, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 09-14-00018-CRNO. 09-14-00019-CR

11-25-2014

RUDY TRUJILLO DIMAS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 258th District Court Polk County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 22483 CT I & CT II

ORDER

The clerk's record in the above styled and numbered cause was filed March 7, 2014, and the reporter's records were filed April 9, 2014, April 10, 2014, and April 14, 2014. On July 22, 2014, the Court granted an extension of time to file the brief, noting that the extension was a "FINAL EXTENSION." On May 22, 2014, the appellant's court-appointed attorney, Scott Pawgan, was notified that neither the brief of the appellant nor a motion for extension of time to file the brief has been filed. Although the brief of the appellant was due to be filed Friday, August 15, 2014, the brief has not been filed.

We abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court to conduct a hearing at which a representative of the State, counsel for the appellant, and the appellant shall be present in person. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3). If the appellant is not incarcerated, but fails to appear at the hearing after having been notified to do so, or after reasonable attempts to notify him have been made, then the trial court may enter a finding that appellant no longer desires to pursue the appeal and send said finding to this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(4). If the appellant is present for the hearing, we direct the trial court to determine whether or not appellant desires to pursue his appeal. If appellant desires to pursue his appeal, we direct the trial court to determine why the brief of the appellant has not been filed, why appellant's counsel has not responded to late notices from this Court, and whether good cause exists for appointed counsel, Scott Pawgan, to be relieved of his duties as appellate counsel and replaced by substitute counsel. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.04(j)(2) (West Supp. 2014). If the trial court determines that good cause exists to relieve appointed counsel of his duties, we direct the trial court to appoint substitute counsel.

The record of the hearing, including any orders and findings of the trial court judge, shall be sent to the appellate court for filing. The transcription of the court reporter's notes from the hearing and the recommendations of the trial court judge are to be filed on or before December 29, 2014.

ORDER ENTERED November 25, 2014.

PER CURIAM Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.


Summaries of

Dimas v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Nov 25, 2014
NO. 09-14-00018-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 25, 2014)
Case details for

Dimas v. State

Case Details

Full title:RUDY TRUJILLO DIMAS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Nov 25, 2014

Citations

NO. 09-14-00018-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 25, 2014)