From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dillingham v. Dusovich

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 17, 2024
CV 23-2008-JGB (AS) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2024)

Opinion

CV 23-2008-JGB (AS)

07-17-2024

RICKY DILLINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. ALEXANDER DUSOVICH, et. al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMNEDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JESUS G. BERNAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of a United States Magistrate Judge to which no objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that (1) Plaintiff's Motion to Amend (Dkt. No. 56) and Request for Ruling (Dkt. No. 57) is DENIED AS MOOT; and (2) Plaintiff's motion to Withdraw/Supplement (Dkt. No. 58) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants.


Summaries of

Dillingham v. Dusovich

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 17, 2024
CV 23-2008-JGB (AS) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2024)
Case details for

Dillingham v. Dusovich

Case Details

Full title:RICKY DILLINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. ALEXANDER DUSOVICH, et. al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 17, 2024

Citations

CV 23-2008-JGB (AS) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2024)