From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dillard v. Davis

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Apr 12, 2022
Civil Action 7:19-cv-00081-M-BP (N.D. Tex. Apr. 12, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 7:19-cv-00081-M-BP

04-12-2022

DANIEL D. DILLARD, TDCJ No. 1400285, Plaintiff, v. LORIE DAVIS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

BARBARA M. G. LYNN, CHIEF JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. Plaintiff filed objections on April 6, 2022 [ECF No. 202]. The District Court reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation de novo. Finding no error, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff Daniel Dillard's claims against Jose Mares, Lavonda McLemore, and Bridgette Smalley are DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that Defendants Smalley & McLemore's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 180) and Dillard's Motion for Leave to Conduct Discovery (ECF No. 186) are DENIED as moot.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dillard v. Davis

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Apr 12, 2022
Civil Action 7:19-cv-00081-M-BP (N.D. Tex. Apr. 12, 2022)
Case details for

Dillard v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL D. DILLARD, TDCJ No. 1400285, Plaintiff, v. LORIE DAVIS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Apr 12, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 7:19-cv-00081-M-BP (N.D. Tex. Apr. 12, 2022)

Citing Cases

Spence v. Taylor

His claim falls outside the scope of the Parratt/Hudson doctrine, and, therefore, a section 1983 procedural…