From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dike v. Zara U.S., Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 22, 2024
23-cv-00342-WHO (N.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-00342-WHO

01-22-2024

GINIKA DIKE, Plaintiff, v. ZARA USA, INC., Defendant.


ORDER FOR DISMISSAL UPON STIPULATION

RE: DKT. NO. 29

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff GINIKA DIKE and defendant ZARA USA INC., have stipulated to a dismissal with prejudice of this entire action, except for the non-individual claims of Dike in the Fifth Cause of Action. Dkt. No. 29. Accordingly, plaintiff Ginika Dike's individual claims alleged in this action are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The class claims, and the non-individual Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) claims asserted in the Fifth Cause of Action, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs.


Summaries of

Dike v. Zara U.S., Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 22, 2024
23-cv-00342-WHO (N.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Dike v. Zara U.S., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GINIKA DIKE, Plaintiff, v. ZARA USA, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 22, 2024

Citations

23-cv-00342-WHO (N.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2024)