From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DiIorio v. Antonelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 1997
240 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

June 16, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Goldstein, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion pursuant to CPLR 3215 for leave to enter a judgment upon the defendant's default in answering upon the condition that the defendant serve an affidavit of a meritorious defense, since the defendant offered a reasonable excuse for her delay in ultimately serving an answer (see, Silberstein v. Presbyterian Hosp., 96 A.D.2d 1096). The record clearly reflects that both parties had entered into an oral stipulation to extend the defendant's time to answer, and that the defendant relied upon such stipulation (see, Volin v. City Beach Catering Corp., 166 A.D.2d 583; La Marque v. North Shore Univ. Hosp., 120 A.D.2d 572). The record is inconclusive as to whether there was an agreed-upon due date, and the defendant's brief delay in answering the plaintiff's ultimate request was neither intentional nor serious enough to prejudice the plaintiff's prosecution of his lawsuit (CPLR 2005; Harris v. Triangle Aviation Servs., 110 A.D.2d 882, 884).

Mangano, P.J., Sullivan, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

DiIorio v. Antonelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 1997
240 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

DiIorio v. Antonelli

Case Details

Full title:JOHN DiIORIO, Appellant, v. FRANCES ANTONELLI, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 16, 1997

Citations

240 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
658 N.Y.S.2d 453

Citing Cases

Deimel v. Aboff

The purpose of requiring a writing before the Court will permit the enforcement of the stipulation is "to…

Performance Freight, Inc. v. United Collective Corp.

[ ] SETTLE/SUBMIT ORDER/JUDG. including appearing in the court on the return date of the motion and handing…