From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DiGiantomasso v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Sep 1, 2020
No. CIV-19-0631-C (W.D. Okla. Sep. 1, 2020)

Opinion

No. CIV-19-0631-C

09-01-2020

ADINA MARIE DiGIANTOMASSO, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This action for judicial review of the Commissioner's denial of disability insurance benefits was referred for initial proceedings to United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell, consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Purcell entered a Report and Recommendation on August 6, 2020, recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings. The court file reflects that no party has objected to the Report and Recommendation within the time limits prescribed. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 27) of the Magistrate Judge is adopted in its entirety, and this matter is reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. A judgment shall enter accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of September, 2020.

/s/_________

ROBIN J. CAUTHRON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

DiGiantomasso v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Sep 1, 2020
No. CIV-19-0631-C (W.D. Okla. Sep. 1, 2020)
Case details for

DiGiantomasso v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:ADINA MARIE DiGIANTOMASSO, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of the…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Sep 1, 2020

Citations

No. CIV-19-0631-C (W.D. Okla. Sep. 1, 2020)