Summary
finding that the plaintiff was not entitled to equitable tolling because his previous actions in state court were dismissed on statute of limitations grounds
Summary of this case from Honchariw v. Cnty. of StanislausOpinion
No. CIV S-05-1168 DFL GGH P.
August 30, 2006
ORDER
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.
On June 8, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed June 8, 2006, are adopted in full; and
2. Defendant's motion to dismiss filed December 20, 2005, construed as a summary judgment motion, is granted.