From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DiFiore v. Pezic

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jul 11, 2022
251 N.J. 374 (N.J. 2022)

Opinion

M-1222 September Term 2021 087091

07-11-2022

Kathleen DIFIORE, Plaintiff-Movant, v. Tomo PEZIC, Pezo, Inc., Great American Assurance Co., Chubb, and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., & Bollinger, Inc., Defendants, and Driss Elhamdouchi, Route 94 Limousine, Inc., and 201 Taxicab, LLC, Defendants, Dora Deleon, Plaintiff, v. The Achilles Foot and Ankle Group, Franklin N. Levinson, and Eileen F. Levinson, Defendants. Jorge Remache-Robalino, Plaintiff, v. Nader Boulos, M.D., Lani Mendelson, M.D., and St. Joseph's Regional Medical Center, Defendants.



ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for leave to appeal is granted.


Summaries of

DiFiore v. Pezic

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jul 11, 2022
251 N.J. 374 (N.J. 2022)
Case details for

DiFiore v. Pezic

Case Details

Full title:Kathleen DIFIORE, Plaintiff-Movant, v. Tomo PEZIC, Pezo, Inc., Great…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Jul 11, 2022

Citations

251 N.J. 374 (N.J. 2022)
277 A.3d 462