From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dietzmann v. Aramark Servs. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 19, 2017
2:16-cv-01771-RFB-CWH (D. Nev. Apr. 19, 2017)

Opinion

2:16-cv-01771-RFB-CWH

04-19-2017

BART W. DIETZMANN, Plaintiff, v. ARAMARK SERVICES INC. et al., Defendants.


ORDER

I. DISCUSSION

According the Clark County Detention Center ("CCDC") inmate database, Plaintiff is no longer incarcerated at the CCDC. However, Plaintiff has not filed an updated address with this Court. Pursuant to Nevada Local Special Rule 2-2, "[t]he plaintiff must immediately file with the court written notification of any change of address. The notification must include proof of service on each opposing party or the party's attorney. Failure to comply with this rule may result in dismissal of the action with prejudice." Nev. Loc. Special R. 2-2. The Court grants Plaintiff thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order to file his updated address with this Court. If Plaintiff does not update the Court with his current address within thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order, the Court will recommend that this case be dismissed without prejudice.

II. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file his updated address with the Court within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. /// ///

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff fails to timely comply with this order, the Court will recommend that this case be dismissed without prejudice.

DATED: April 19, 2017

/s/_________

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Dietzmann v. Aramark Servs. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 19, 2017
2:16-cv-01771-RFB-CWH (D. Nev. Apr. 19, 2017)
Case details for

Dietzmann v. Aramark Servs. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BART W. DIETZMANN, Plaintiff, v. ARAMARK SERVICES INC. et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 19, 2017

Citations

2:16-cv-01771-RFB-CWH (D. Nev. Apr. 19, 2017)