From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dietrich v. Kohlmoos

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jul 7, 2011
373 P.3d 909 (Nev. 2011)

Opinion

No. 57853.

07-07-2011

Janelle DIETRICH, Appellant, v. William KOHLMOOS, Respondent.

Janelle Dietrich Van Walraven & Harris


Janelle Dietrich

Van Walraven & Harris

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a proper person appeal from a district court order enforcing a settlement. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Connie J. Steinheimer, Judge.

Our review of the documents before us on appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, it appears that the order appellant is challenging is not a final, appealable judgment. See NRAP 3A(b)(l) (providing for an appeal from a final judgment in an action or proceeding). A final judgment is one that disposes of all issues presented in the case and leaves nothing for the future consideration of the district court, except for post-judgment issues such as attorney fees and costs. Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 996 P.2d 416 (2000). Here, the district court order enforces a settlement but does not dismiss or otherwise formally resolve the complaint. See Valley Bank of Nevada v. Ginsburg, 110 Nev. 440, 874 P.2d 729 (1994) ; KDI Sylvan Pools v. Workman, 107 Nev. 340, 810 P.2d 1217 (1991). Accordingly, as a final judgment has not been entered in the underlying case, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Appellant's March 15, 2011, motion to remand is denied as moot in light of this order.


Summaries of

Dietrich v. Kohlmoos

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jul 7, 2011
373 P.3d 909 (Nev. 2011)
Case details for

Dietrich v. Kohlmoos

Case Details

Full title:Janelle DIETRICH, Appellant, v. William KOHLMOOS, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Jul 7, 2011

Citations

373 P.3d 909 (Nev. 2011)