From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diehard Exterminating Inc. v. Musto

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 18, 2021
21-cv-7598 (CM)(OTW) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 18, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-7598 (CM)(OTW)

10-18-2021

DIEHARD EXTERMINATING INC. and PEST ELIMINATION SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiffs, v. DANIEL MUSTO, Defendant.

PLAINTIFFS DIEHARD EXTERMINATING INC. AND PEST ELIMINATION SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC.SCHWARTZ-SLADKUS REICH GREENBERG ATLAS LLP STEPHEN H. OREL ETHAN A. KOBRE VICTORIA R. SERIGANO DEFENDANT DANIEL MUSTO BEE READY FISHBEIN HATTER & DONOVAN, LLP DEANNA D. PANICO


PLAINTIFFS DIEHARD EXTERMINATING INC. AND PEST ELIMINATION SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC.SCHWARTZ-SLADKUS REICH GREENBERG ATLAS LLP STEPHEN H. OREL ETHAN A. KOBRE VICTORIA R. SERIGANO

DEFENDANT DANIEL MUSTO BEE READY FISHBEIN HATTER & DONOVAN, LLP DEANNA D. PANICO

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION

COLLEEN MCMAHON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The following provisions shall govern the exchange of confidential information in this matter:

1. Counsel for any party may designate any document, information contained in a document, information revealed in an interrogatory response or information revealed during a deposition as confidential if counsel determines, in good faith, that such designation is necessary to protect the interests of the client. Information and documents designated as confidential are to be stamped "CONFIDENTIAL." "Confidential" information or documents may be referred to collectively as "Confidential Information."

2. Unless ordered by the court or otherwise provided for herein, the Confidential Information disclosed will be held and used by the person receiving such information solely for use in connection with the above-captioned action.

3. In the event that a party challenges another party's designation, counsel shall make a good faith effort to resolve the dispute, and in the absence of a resolution, the challenging party may thereafter seek resolution by the court. Nothing in this Protective Order constitutes an admission by any party that Confidential Information disclosed in this case is relevant or admissible. Each party specifically reserves the right to object to the use or admissibility of all Confidential Information disclosed, in accordance with applicable laws and court rules.

4. Information or documents designated as "Confidential" shall not be disclosed to any person except:

a. The requesting party and counsel, including in-house counsel;
b. Employees of such counsel assigned to and necessary to assist in the litigation;
c. The Court (including the clerk, court reporter or stenographer, or other person having access to Confidential Information by virtue of his or her position with the Court) or the jury at trial or as exhibits to motions.
d. Subject to the condition set forth in Paragraph 6 below: consultants or experts in the prosecution or defense of the matter, to the extent deemed necessary by counsel;
1
e. Subject to the condition set forth in Paragraph 6 below: any person from who testimony is taken or is to be taken in this action, except that such a person may only be shown Confidential Information during and in preparation for his/her testimony and may not retain the Confidential Information; and

5. Prior to disclosing or displaying Confidential Information to any person, counsel shall:

a. inform the person of the confidential nature of the information or documents;
b. inform the person that this Court has enjoined the use of the information or documents by him/her for any purpose other than this litigation and has enjoined the disclosure of that information or documents to any other person.

6. The Confidential Information may be displayed to and discussed with the persons identified in Paragraphs 4(d) and (e) only on condition that prior to any such display each person must sign an agreement to be bound by this Order in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. In the event that such person refuses to sign an agreement in the form attached as Exhibit A, the party desiring to disclose the Confidential Information may seek appropriate relief from the Court.

7. The disclosure of a document or information without designating it as "confidential" shall not constitute a waiver of the right to designate such document or information as Confidential Information provided the material is designated pursuant to the procedures set forth herein no later than fourteen (14) days after that close of discovery or fourteen (14) days after the production of the document or information. If so designated, the document or information shall thenceforth be treated as Confidential Information subject to all of the terms of the Stipulation and Order.

8. All information subject to confidential treatment in accordance with the terms of this Stipulation and Order that is filed with the Court, including any pleadings, motions or other papers filed with the Court that includes Confidential Information, shall be filed under seal to the extent permitted by law (including, without limitation any applicable rules of court) and shall be kept under seal until further order of the Court. To the extent that the Court requires any further act by the parties as a precondition to the filing of documents under seal (beyond the submission of this Stipulation and Order Regarding Confidential Information), it shall be the obligation of the producing party of the documents to be filed with the Court to satisfy any such precondition. Where possible, only confidential portions of the filings with the Court shall be filed under seal.

9. At the conclusion of the litigation, the Confidential Information and any copies thereof shall be promptly (and in no event no later than thirty (30) days after entry of final judgment no longer subject to further appeal) returned to the producing party or certified as destroyed, except that the parties' counsel shall be permitted to retain their working files on the condition that such files will remain confidential.

The foregoing is without prejudice to the right of any party to apply to the Court for any further Protective Order relating to Confidential Information; or to object to the production of documents or information; or to apply to the Court for an order compelling production of documents or information; or for modification of this order. This Order may be enforced by any party and any violation of this order may result in the imposition of sanctions by the Court. 2

ADDENDUM

1. The parties understand that the Court's "so ordering" of this stipulation does not make the Court a party to the stipulation or imply that the Court agrees that documents designated as "Confidential" by the parties are in fact confidential.

2. It has been this Court's consistent experience that confidentiality stipulations are abused by parties and that much material that is not truly confidential is designated as such. The Court does not intend to be a party to such practices. The Court operates under a presumption that the entire record should be publicly available.

3. The Court does not ordinarily file decisions under seal or redact material from them. If the Court issues a decision in this case that refers to "confidential" material under this stipulation, the decision will not be published for ten days. The parties must, within that ten-day period, identify to the Court any portion of the decision that one or more of them believe should be redacted, provide the Court with the purportedly confidential material, and explain why that material is truly confidential. The Court will then determine whether the material is in fact genuinely deserving of confidential treatment. The Court will only redact portions of a publicly available decision if it concludes that the material discussed is in fact deserving of such treatment. The Court's decision in this regard is final. If this addendum is acceptable to the parties, the Court will sign their proposed confidentiality stipulation, subject to the addendum. If this addendum is not acceptable, the Court will not sign the stipulation, and should allegedly confidential material be produced, the parties will be referred to the magistrate judge for a document by document review and decision on whether that document should be subject to confidential treatment. 3

EXHIBIT A

I have been informed by counsel that certain documents or information to be disclosed to me in connection with the matter entitled: Diehard Exterminating Inc. and Pest Elimination Systems Technology, Inc. v. Daniel Musto, Docket No. 21-cv-7598, have been designated as confidential. I have been informed that any such documents or information labeled "CONFIDENTIAL" are confidential by Order of the Court.

I hereby agree that I will not disclose any information contained in such documents to any other person. I further agree not to use any such information for any purpose other than this litigation. 4


Summaries of

Diehard Exterminating Inc. v. Musto

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 18, 2021
21-cv-7598 (CM)(OTW) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 18, 2021)
Case details for

Diehard Exterminating Inc. v. Musto

Case Details

Full title:DIEHARD EXTERMINATING INC. and PEST ELIMINATION SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 18, 2021

Citations

21-cv-7598 (CM)(OTW) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 18, 2021)