Opinion
20-CV-5137 (CM)
07-08-2020
GERALD C. DIDOMENICO, JR., Plaintiff, v. SUPERINTENDENT, et al., Defendants.
TRANSFER ORDER :
Plaintiff, currently incarcerated in Clinton Correctional Facility (Clinton), brings this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking to be "expelled from the Intermediate Care Program" because unnamed individuals are violating his rights. (ECF No. 1.) For the following reasons, this action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York.
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), a civil action may be brought in:
(1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located; (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated; or (3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court's personal jurisdiction with respect to such action.Under § 1391(c), a "natural person" resides in the district where the person is domiciled, and an "entity with the capacity to sue and be sued" resides in any judicial district where it is subject to personal jurisdiction with respect to the civil action in question. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(c)(1), (2).
Plaintiff sues unnamed individuals who are violating his rights with respect to the Intermediate Care Program in Clinton. He describes the unnamed defendants as people who "are obliged by Central New York Psychiatric Center, and authority from Albany, to make patients [in Clinton] feel continuously ill." (ECF No. 1.) Because Plaintiff does not allege that any defendant resides in this district or that a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to his claim arose in this district, venue is not proper in this Court under § 1391(b)(1), (2). Plaintiff's claims arose in Clinton County, New York, which is in the Northern District of New York. See 28 U.S.C. § 112. Accordingly, venue lies in the Northern District of New York, 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2), and this action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).
CONCLUSION
The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Clerk of Court is further directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. Whether Plaintiff should be permitted to proceed further without prepayment of fees is a determination to be made by the transferee court. A summons shall not issue from this Court. This order closes this case.
Plaintiff did not submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis nor a prisoner authorization. --------
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: July 8, 2020
New York, New York
/s/_________
COLLEEN McMAHON
Chief United States District Judge