Didomenico v. North American Constr. Corp.

1 Citing case

  1. GREG OPINSKI CONST. v. BRASWELL CONSTRUCTION

    1:09-cv-00641 LJO SKO, Doc. 59 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)

    The Ninth Circuit, however, has interpreted the Prompt Payment Act amendment differently. In Didomenico v. North American Construction Corp., 94 Fed. Appx. 598 (9th Cir. 2004), the surety argued that penalties and attorneys' fees allowed under California law are not remedies permissible under the Miller Act. See id. at *599.