From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dickson v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Sep 22, 2009
Case No. CIV-08-1375-F (W.D. Okla. Sep. 22, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-08-1375-F.

September 22, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff Carl E. Dickson brings this action seeking judicial review of a denial of benefits by the Social Security Administration.

Magistrate Judge Robert E. Bacharach issued a Report and Recommendation on August 31, 2009 (doc. no. 15), recommending that the Commissioner's decision be reversed and that the matter be remanded with directions for the Social Security Administration to award insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The Commissioner has filed an objection asking the court to reject the recommendations of the magistrate judge, to affirm the administrative law judge and deny benefits or, alternatively, to remand the case for further proceedings. (Objections at doc. no. 16.)

Having reviewed the Report, the record, and the relevant arguments and authorities, the court finds that no purpose would be served by setting out any further analysis here. The court rejects the Commissioner's objections to the Report and finds that the Report should be adopted in its entirety.

Accordingly, the court ACCEPTS, AFFIRMS, and ADOPTS the findings and recommendations of Magistrate Judge Bacharach as stated in his Report and Recommendation. The decision of the administrative law judge denying benefits is REVERSED. This matter is hereby REMANDED with instructions for the Social Security Administration to award insurance benefits and supplemental security income.


Summaries of

Dickson v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Sep 22, 2009
Case No. CIV-08-1375-F (W.D. Okla. Sep. 22, 2009)
Case details for

Dickson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Case Details

Full title:CARL E. DICKSON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Sep 22, 2009

Citations

Case No. CIV-08-1375-F (W.D. Okla. Sep. 22, 2009)

Citing Cases

Snoe v. Astrue

The court cannot speculate on whether the ALJ would have reached the same conclusion regarding the weight he…

Reeves v. Astrue

The court cannot speculate on whether the ALJ would have reached the same conclusion regarding the weight he…