From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dickess v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Dec 15, 2010
Case No. 1:09cv635 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 15, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 1:09cv635.

December 15, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on November 24, 2010 (Doc. 9).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, this Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to be correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1) is DENIED with prejudice.

A certificate of appealability and in forma pauperis status will not be issued/granted consistent with the Opinion by the Magistrate Judge as outlined in the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 9).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Exhibit


Summaries of

Dickess v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Dec 15, 2010
Case No. 1:09cv635 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 15, 2010)
Case details for

Dickess v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution

Case Details

Full title:Christopher Dickess, Petitioner, v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Dec 15, 2010

Citations

Case No. 1:09cv635 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 15, 2010)